Janae Ruppert

by Janae Ruppert

As an employer, you exhaustingly hear the repeated recommendation to not only have detailed written policies, but to ensure those policies are followed. Company policies generally ensure compliance with laws and regulations, give guidance for decision-making, and streamline internal processes. Typically, employers can overcome significant consequences by consistently enforcing their policies and procedures.

However, when confronted with accommodation situations, sometimes employers need to step away from the policies and conduct a deeper factual analysis to support a decision. The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals recently provided useful guidance on how to properly address an accommodation request which may violate an internal policy. The court sent a case back for a trial after finding that just because a corrections officer’s requested accommodation violated the employer’s neutral policy, inconsistency with the policy by itself, did not render the request unreasonable. Read more >>

David Law

by David Law

On Wednesday, October 4, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) announced that Public Service Company of New Mexico (PSCNM) and PNMR Services Co. agreed to pay $750,000 (among other terms) to settle a case alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).  This announcement is a good reminder for employers to review their policies and practices impacting employees who are returning from a medical leave of absence.

In the lawsuit, the EEOC alleged that PNM had a policy or practice of failing to accommodate qualified employees with disabilities.  Specifically, the EEOC alleged that employees were not allowed to return to work after a medical leave of absence unless they were released to “full duty” and could perform their job functions without medical restrictions.  Employers cannot, however, condition an employee’s return to work on his or her ability to work without restrictions.  Instead, when an employee is returning from some type of medical leave, employers should contact the employee to confirm the return to work date, and inform the employee that if accommodations are needed, the employee must inform the employer so that the parties can engage in the interactive process. Read more >>

Jordan Walsh

By Jordan Walsh

The Americans with Disabilities Act (the “ADA”) generally prohibits employers from taking adverse employment actions against an employee because of the employee’s disability. To challenge an employment action under the ADA, a plaintiff must show that (1) she is disabled within the meaning of the ADA; (2) she is qualified for her position, even with her disability, with or without a reasonable accommodation; and (3) she suffered an adverse employment action because of her disability. See Mayo v. PCC Structurals, Inc., 795 F.3d 941, 944 (9th Cir. 2015).  If this showing is made, the burden shifts to the employer to present a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for the employment action. See Curley v. City of North Las Vegas, 772 F.3d 629, 632 (9th Cir. 2014). If the burden is met the plaintiff must establish that the employer’s reason for the adverse employment action was pretextual. See id. Read more >>

By Mark Wiletsky

Mark Wiletsky

Question: For employees working from home, we currently don’t provide reimbursement for furniture without a doctor’s note stating a need for an ergonomic chair or desk. If we require someone to work from home more than half the time, do we have to purchase an ergonomic chair other than for Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) purposes?

Answer: Probably not. You’re correct that the provision of specialized equipment (including, potentially, an ergonomic chair or special desk) can be considered a reasonable accommodation under the ADA, but you likely have no obligation to provide such equipment to employees unless they are disabled within the meaning of the Act and you determine through the interactive process the equipment requested may reasonably accommodate their disabilities by allowing them to
perform the essential job functions.

Read more >>